At the start…

Beginning a thesis is a trying task, especially when you have little to no research background. Sure, I wrote a few papers in my undergrad, but these were mostly done in a short period of time with fairly clear guidelines and expectations. There was usually a pretty specific topic and an argument or point of view was not hard to develop. I quickly learned how to find quotes that served my purpose, but didn’t take the time to read/understand the full context of the ideas presented by the author. I simply came up with my ideas and then looked for research that supported them.

A masters thesis is different. I need to have a complete understanding of the area of study before forming the research question and argument.  While, I have an overall concept of where the research will go, there needs to be justification for undertaking that research. This means actually reading the articles, understanding what what is being said, and trying to determine what the implications are for my own research. It means making sure that the research hasn’t already been done, that a fresh perspective can be obtained.

The first stage is to paint a picture of the current knowledge landscape using other people’s work. This picture (why not carry the metaphor further?) needs to accurately depict the ENTIRE landscape and, at the same time, reflect the details of each individual leaf and grass.

Part of the struggle so far was coming to understand the point of the literature review. Being new to research, I was confused by what the point of it was and is. The more I’ve read, the more I’ve seen how authors use a literature review to frame their topic and setup the purpose of their research. A well done literature review clearly makes the reader bob their head in agreement. The reader finds themselves intrigued as to the research done to help answer a clearly defined problem. The lit review is the setup, it frames the rest of the paper and is a crucial part of any good research. It is also a tool for the author. An excellent literature review will build itself from general knowledge to shared knowledge and will culminate in presenting the lack of knowledge in a specific area.

My next post will talk about what sort of strategies and methods I’m using during this intial phase…


3 Responses to “At the start…”

  • Nancy Stuewe Says:

    You could think of it as a field to play in rather than a landscape. I like the metaphor of a sandbox best myself. What toys do you bring to play with? The lit review could be the toys that others have left behind to share with you, enjoy them.Geoff what turns your head to look? What pisses you off? what makes you stop in your tracks? Start writing about that and don’t look back.You do not need to change the world with your research only live in it and contribute to it.
    Nancy

  • Geoff Says:

    I like that view as well. I would imagine that when I go to actually write the lit review, that metaphor will be very appropriate. Right now, I guess you could say that I’m collecting as many toys as I can for my sandbox. I want to make sure I have as many choices as possible when it comes time to play!

  • Danya Says:

    Hi Geoff,

    The thing that I found (being not much more of a newbie than you) is that you don’t actually need all of the detail, or even a whole landscape. I can’t tell you how much you need, but I supppose until you have exceeded the limit you don’t know what it is?! Hmm, not so helpful.

    Love the blog. I have been intending to document more, but the most I seem to manage is a few tweets.

    Looking forward to the continuing saga,

    Danya

Leave a Reply